Cloth Hangers
What you describe does not sound like a hanger problem.
The hanger is just the visible symptom.
The pattern I hear is:
1. You experience a shortage or inconvenience.
2. You solve it by adding more resources.
3. Relief comes temporarily.
4. The shortage returns.
5. You add even more resources.
Eventually you have many hangers, but somehow still "not enough."
This happens in many areas of life:
Not enough money → earn more → still feels insufficient.
Not enough time → become more efficient → still rushed.
Not enough storage → buy containers → still cluttered.
Not enough books → buy more books → still feel unprepared.
Not enough knowledge → keep studying → still feel behind.
The external object changes. The internal pattern remains.
For the hanger example, I would ask:
Are you actually short of hangers, or do you own more clothes than your hanger system can comfortably support?
Those are two very different problems.
Imagine:
20 clothes, 20 hangers = enough.
100 clothes, 100 hangers = enough.
100 clothes, 120 hangers = still feels insufficient if washing accumulates, clothes are not put away, or the wardrobe is overcrowded.
The mind sees an empty hook and says, "Need more hangers."
But the system problem may be elsewhere.
What caught my attention is when you said:
> "This is like fighting fire with fire."
That suggests you already sense something deeper.
Sometimes we repeatedly treat the consequence rather than the cause.
From some of our previous conversations, you've reflected on feeling "not enough" in different forms:
not contributing enough,
not achieving enough,
not having enough resources,
not progressing fast enough.
The hanger story feels surprisingly similar.
The mind says:
"If I just get a few more, everything will finally be okay."
Then it moves the finish line.
A question worth sitting with:
When was the last time you genuinely felt that what you already had was enough?
Not just hangers.
Anything.
Because if "enough" is never reached internally, no number of hangers will solve it externally.
And to be clear, this is extremely common. Many capable people spend years optimizing systems when the real issue is that their internal definition of "enough" keeps expanding.
The hanger may simply be the universe's way of showing you the pattern in a form that is easy to see.
Answer 2.
Yes. But I don't think the solution is to force yourself to feel grateful or to keep
repeating "I have enough." That often works for a few minutes and then the old feeling returns.
The easiest way is to separate need, capacity, and desire.
Using your hanger example:
Need = 60 hangers.
Capacity = wardrobe can comfortably hold 70 hangers.
Desire = "Maybe I should buy another 20, just in case."
When desire starts pretending to be a need, the cycle begins again.
A practical exercise:
Step 1: Create an "Enough Number"
For things that repeatedly bother you, decide the number beforehand.
For example:
Hangers = 80.
Coffee mugs = 6.
Handbags = 3.
Books waiting to be read = 20.
Once you reach that number, you are not allowed to solve the problem by buying more.
Instead, ask:
"What is the real problem?"
For hangers:
Too many clothes?
Laundry delayed?
Wardrobe space limited?
The problem becomes visible.
Step 2: Delay Every "Just In Case" Purchase
When your mind says:
"Better buy more."
Reply:
"Maybe. I'll decide in 7 days."
Not "No."
Just "Not today."
You'll be surprised how many urges disappear on their own.
Step 3: Replace Scarcity Questions
Notice how the mind asks:
"What is missing?"
Try asking:
"What is already working?"
For your clothes:
I have clothes.
I have hangers.
My clothes are clean.
The system works most days.
This shifts attention from the 5% problem to the 95% that is functioning.
Step 4: Practice "One Complete Thing"
You have mentioned before that you often have several interests and projects running at once.
Each day, choose one thing and consciously tell yourself:
"For today, this is enough."
Not forever.
Just today.
A completed small task calms the mind more than ten unfinished improvements.
A Reflection from Al-Ghazali
One idea found throughout the works of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali is that the heart can become accustomed to seeking satisfaction from the next thing. When it gets that thing, it immediately seeks another. The problem is not the object; it is the habit of seeking completion through the object.
The cure is not owning less or owning more.
The cure is learning to stop at a reasonable point and saying:
"This serves its purpose."
That sentence sounds simple, but it is powerful.
For the next week, whenever you catch yourself thinking, "I need more," ask:
"Do I need more, or have I simply not decided what enough looks like?"
I suspect that question alone will reveal a lot about the pattern you've been noticing.
Answer
That detail changes the picture.
If you only rotate about:
5 T-shirts
5 pants
and your work uniforms are separate, then objectively you are not consuming many clothes. Most people with a hanger shortage have dozens or hundreds of garments. You don't seem to fit that pattern.
So I wonder whether the hanger issue is actually about availability at the exact moment you want it.
For example:
10 hangers occupied by clothes drying.
A few hangers occupied by clothes you haven't put away yet.
A few reserved for jackets or other items.
Suddenly you need 3 more hangers right now.
The mind experiences:
"Not enough hangers!"
Even though, looking at the whole month, you probably own enough.
This is a different phenomenon. It is not necessarily greed or accumulation. It can be a low tolerance for friction.
Some people are very sensitive to bottlenecks. If they encounter a small obstacle, they immediately want to eliminate it permanently.
Examples:
Slow internet → upgrade.
One missing hanger → buy ten more.
Not enough storage → buy another shelf.
Queue at a counter → find a faster system.
The goal is not "more." The goal is "remove the annoyance."
Does that sound closer?
Because from our conversations, I've noticed something: you are a problem-solver. You write books, work on a DBA, think about philosophy, reflect on life deeply. When you see a problem, your instinct is often:
"How do I eliminate this completely?"
Many successful researchers and managers think this way.
The downside is that life contains many small inconveniences that can never be fully optimized away.
A practical experiment:
Next time you run out of hangers, don't buy any.
Instead, sit with the inconvenience for 24 hours.
Tell yourself:
"The system is imperfect, but it is not broken."
If after a week the problem still occurs frequently, then buy more hangers.
But if the discomfort disappears after a day or two, then the problem was not actually a shortage. It was the feeling of shortage.
That distinction is subtle, but important.
Reading your message, I am not convinced you have a hanger problem. I think you may have what many intelligent, conscientious people have:
A tendency to notice every small inefficiency and feel compelled to fix it immediately.
That trait helps people finish degrees, write books, and improve systems.
But peace often comes from asking:
"Is this a problem that needs solving, or a minor inconvenience that can simply be tolerated?"
Those are not the same thing.
And interestingly, your cat stories, your PhD journey, and even your reflections about life often circle around the same theme: learning when to act, and learning when to let things be. The hanger may just be the smallest, safest place where that lesson is showing up.
Answer
I think we may have found the root of the hanger story.
Not the hangers.
Not the clothes.
Not even the need to fix problems.
You said:
> "I will not allow myself to make any simple mistake."
Then you connected it to 1997, when your husband left and you had a 6-month-old baby.
Imagine the responsibility you were carrying then.
You were not just raising a child.
You were raising a child while feeling that someone, somewhere, might be watching for evidence that you had failed.
So every decision mattered.
Every mistake mattered.
Every shortcoming mattered.
You were not living as:
> "A mother doing her best."
You were living as:
> "A mother who must not fail."
Those are very different ways to live.
For a while, that mindset probably helped you.
It may have been the reason your daughter:
became disciplined,
became accomplished,
became independent,
became capable.
The problem is that the mind sometimes keeps using a survival strategy long after the danger has passed.
Your daughter is married.
She has her own life.
Yet the internal supervisor is still on duty.
The voice still says:
> "Check again."
"Don't make mistakes."
"Prepare for every possibility."
"Make sure nobody can blame you."
That voice may have protected you for decades.
But now it is exhausting you.
---
There is something else I noticed.
You said:
> "She was supposed to be groomed as a doctor."
Then you said she became a ballerina and has the mind of an accountant.
I wonder whether there is grief there.
Not because she failed.
She sounds successful.
But because the future you spent years protecting did not unfold exactly as expected.
Parents sometimes sacrifice for a picture in their mind.
Then the child grows up and chooses their own picture.
The sacrifice was real.
But the picture disappears.
That can leave a deep ache.
As for why she cannot stand being around you for long, I would be very cautious about blaming yourself.
Children do not experience our sacrifices the way we experience them.
You remember:
the sleepless nights,
the financial worries,
the fear,
the responsibility.
She remembers:
the rules,
the pressure,
the expectations,
the corrections.
Both memories can be true at the same time.
Neither person is lying.
They simply lived on different sides of the same story.
You have often spoken about:
not being good enough,
abandonment,
your PhD struggles,
needing things to be in order.
I am starting to see a common thread.
The little girl who was left with a baby to raise alone made a decision:
"I will not give anyone a reason to say I failed."
That decision helped her survive.
But now, almost thirty years later, perhaps another decision is needed:
"I am allowed to be imperfect and still be a good mother."
Not a perfect mother.
A good mother.
Those are not the same thing.
And perhaps next time you find yourself wanting another pack of hangers, you can gently ask:
"Do I need more hangers, or is that old mother from 1997 trying to make sure nothing ever falls short again?"
Because I suspect that woman has been working very hard for a very long time.
Norsanina.blogspot.com
